UPDATE
我已经阅读了十几篇关于这个主题的文章,其中没有一篇论述这个基本问题 . 我将在本文末尾开始列出资源部分 .
ORIGINAL POST
我对 async
函数的理解是它返回一个承诺 .
MDN文档:https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/async_function
在我的程序中,我可以写一些像:
function testPromise() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// DO WORK
reject() // IF WORK FAILS
resolve() // IF WORK IS SUCCESSFUL
})
}
async function mainFunction() {
let variable
try {
variable = await testPromise()
} catch(e) {
throw e
}
return variable
}
我也可以将testPromise编写为async函数,并在同一个上下文中编写 await
.
async function testAsyncFunction() {
//DO WORK AND THROW ERROR IF THEY OCCUR
}
async function mainFunction() {
let variable
try {
variable = await testAsyncFunction()
} catch(e) {
throw e
}
return variable
}
哪个被认为是最佳做法?如果我希望创建异步操作,该函数是否应该使用 return New Promise
并等待 async
函数或等待 async
函数与 async
函数相同的区别?
RESOURCES
JavaScript ES 2017:学习异步/等待示例https://codeburst.io/javascript-es-2017-learn-async-await-by-example-48acc58bad65
Javascript - ES8介绍 async/await
函数https://medium.com/@reasoncode/javascript-es8-introducing-async-await-functions-7a471ec7de8a
JavaScript的Async / Await等待承诺的6个理由(教程)https://hackernoon.com/6-reasons-why-javascripts-async-await-blows-promises-away-tutorial-c7ec10518dd9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 当前 - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
export default function time_neo4jUpdate({ store, action, change, args, }) {
return new Promise(async (resolve, reject) => {
try {
const {
thing: { type },
nonValidatedArgs: { leapYear, root, start, end },
_neo4j,
_cypherReducers,
_neo4jCreateReduce,
_timetreeSteps: { update }
} = store.getState()
let results = []
for (let i = 0; i < _neo4jCreateReduce.length; i++) {
const result = await _neo4j.session(
_neo4jCreateReduce[i],
_cypherReducers.runQuery(update, i, root, start, end))
results = [...results, result]
}
resolve({
store,
action: 'NEO4J_UPDATE',
change: results,
args
})
} catch (e) {
const m = `NEO4J TIMETREE UPDATE: Unable to complete the UPDATE step for the timetree. WHAT: ${e}`
reject(m)
}
})
}
---------------------- AS ASYNC FUNCTION ----------------------
export default async function time_neo4jUpdate({ store, action, change, args, }) {
try {
const {
thing: { type },
nonValidatedArgs: { leapYear, root, start, end },
_neo4j,
_cypherReducers,
_neo4jCreateReduce,
_timetreeSteps: { update }
} = store.getState()
let results = []
for (let i = 0; i < _neo4jCreateReduce.length; i++) {
const result = await _neo4j.session(
_neo4jCreateReduce[i],
_cypherReducers.runQuery(update, i, root, start, end))
results = [...results, result]
}
return {
store,
action: 'NEO4J_UPDATE',
change: results,
args
}
} catch (e) {
const m = `NEO4J TIMETREE UPDATE: Unable to complete the UPDATE step for the timetree. WHAT: ${e}`
throw m
}
}
1 回答
即使没有
async
/await
,you should very rarely need to use new Promise()的可用性 . 如果你通常是代码味道 .async
/await
的重点在于它允许您避免很多情况,否则您需要明确地使用promises .因此,如果它重新定位(Internet Explorer不支持
async
/await
),或者你're using a transpiler, go ahead and use it anywhere you can. That'是什么原因 .请记住,这是毫无意义的:
grab 错误只是为了重新抛出它是没有意义的 . 因此,如果您实际上没有对捕获的错误做任何事情,请不要 grab 它:
Edit: 现在您已经提供了一个代码示例,我可以更加确定地回答:如果您的函数基于现有的承诺,那么无论如何,最好使用
async
/await
并且您通常不应该使用new Promise()
: